Vnitr Lek 2022, 68(1):26-33 | DOI: 10.36290/vnl.2022.004

Direct costs in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation newly indicated to apixaban: a retrospective‑prospective single‑arm cohort study

Daniela Štrosová1,*, Jan Tužil1, 2,*, Barbora Pilnáčková1, Lada Lžičařová1, Veronika Typovská3, Helena Doležalová1, Martin Herold4, 5, Tomáš Doležal1, 6
1 VALUE OUTCOMES s. r. o., Praha
2 1. lékařská fakulta, Univerzita Karlova, Praha
3 Pfizer, Praha
4 Kardiologická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady, Praha
5 Kardiologická klinika, 3. lékařská fakulta, Univerzita Karlova, Praha
6 Farmakologický ústav, Masarykova univerzita, Brno
* Tito autoři přispěli stejnou měrou

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects 46.3 million people; its prevalence has tripled over the last 50 years. AF leads to formation of blood clots increasing four-fold the risk of a stroke. Preventive anticoagulant therapy with warfarin has been well established for over 50 years but has efficacy and safety limitations. New anticoagulants do not require laboratory monitoring of prothrombin time, have low risk of adverse events, yet are more costly.

Methods: This non-interventional (Act 378/2007 Coll.) retrospective-prospective single-arm cohort study consisted of 3 visits. The primary objective was to compare the total direct cost of treatment with warfarin and apixaban. Patients with non-valvular AF were enrolled at the time of discontinuation of warfarin and switching to apixaban. Costs were derived from the care provided and the list of medical procedures (Decrees 268/ 2019 Coll.). Satisfaction was assessed using SAFUCA® questionnaire.

Results: Between February 2017 and June 2019, 499 patients were enrolled in 29 Czech internal medicine clinics. The mean age of the patients was 73.6 ± 10.2 years, 36.5% were at high risk of bleeding (HAS-BLED score). Previous warfarin treatment lasted 5.9 ± 2.7 months, 63% were unable to achieve target prothrombin time, 18% switched due to adverse reactions. New apixaban treatment was followed for the first 6 months. Treatment with warfarin was associated with higher rates of major bleeding and adverse events (22 vs. 2), stroke (17 vs. 0), ischemic heart attack (11 vs. 0), and minor bleeding (173 vs. 2). The average daily cost following the switch to apixaban decreased from CZK 65.2 to CZK 4.8 (p <0.001). The price of anticoagulant treatment was considered, there was an insignificant increase from CZK 68.1 to CZK 71.7 (p = 0.509). Satisfaction increased significantly after 3 months, notably in the subjective evaluation of efficacy, comfort, impact on quality of life and the occurrence of side effects.

Conclusion: Switching patients with unsatisfactory outcomes on warfarin to apixaban resulted in lower risk of serious ischemic events, bleeding and side effects, and higher patient satisfaction. From the pharmacoeconomic perspective, apixaban is a better choice in this population as it brings higher efficacy and better safety within comparable overall direct costs.

Keywords: anticoagulation, atrial fibrillation, direct costs, apixaban, warfarin, bleeding, real world evidence.

Published: February 14, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Štrosová D, Tužil J, Pilnáčková B, Lžičařová L, Typovská V, Doležalová H, et al.. Direct costs in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation newly indicated to apixaban: a retrospective‑prospective single‑arm cohort study. Vnitr Lek. 2022;68(1):26-33. doi: 10.36290/vnl.2022.004.
Download citation

References

  1. Kornej J, Börschel CS, Benjamin EJ, Schnabel RB. Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation in the 21st Century: Novel Methods and New Insights. Circ Res. 2020;127(1):4-20. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.316340 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Williams BA, Chamberlain AM, Blankenship JC, Hylek EM, Voyce S. Trends in Atrial Fibrillation Incidence Rates Within an Integrated Health Care Delivery System, 2006 to 2018. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2014874. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14874 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation: a major contributor to stroke in the elderly. The Framingham Study. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(9):1561-1564. Go to original source...
  4. Di Carlo A. Human and economic burden of stroke. Age Ageing. 2009;38(1):4-5. doi:10.1093/ageing/afn282 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Hart RG, Benavente O, McBride R, Pearce LA. Antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta‑analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131(7):492-501. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-131-7-199910050-00003 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Gallagher AM, Setakis E, Plumb JM, Clemens A, van Staa T‑P. Risks of stroke and mortality associated with suboptimal anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients. Thromb Haemost. 2011;106(5):968-977. doi:10.1160/TH11-05-0353 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Budnitz DS, Lovegrove MC, Shehab N, Richards CL. Emergency hospitalizations for adverse drug events in older Americans. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(21):2002-2012. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1103053 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Witt DM, Delate T, Garcia DA et al. Risk of thromboembolism, recurrent hemorrhage, and death after warfarin therapy interruption for gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(19):1484-1491. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4261 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Smith SC et al. Risk factors and outcomes for patients with vascular disease and serious bleeding events. Heart Br Card Soc. 2011;97(18):1507-1512. doi:10.1136/hrt.2010.221788 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(10):883-891. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1009638 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(12):1139-1151. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0905561 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(22):2093-2104. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1310907 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Laliberté F, Cloutier M, Crivera C et al. Effects of rivaroxaban versus warfarin on hospitalization days and other health care resource utilization in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: an observational study from a cohort of matched users. Clin Ther. 2015;37(3):554-562. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2015. 02. 001 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Raghavan N, Frost CE, Yu Z et al. Apixaban metabolism and pharmacokinetics after oral administration to humans. Drug Metab Dispos Biol Fate Chem. 2009;37(1):74-81. doi:10.1124/dmd.108.023143 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Amin A, Bruno A, Trocio J, Lin J, Lingohr‑Smith M. Comparison of differences in medical costs when new oral anticoagulants are used for the treatment of patients with non‑valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism vs warfarin or placebo in the US. J Med Econ. 2015;18(6):399-409. doi:10.3111/13696998.2015.1007210 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Lip GYH, Kongnakorn T, Phatak H et al. Cost‑effectiveness of apixaban versus other new oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Clin Ther. 2014;36(2):192-210.e20. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2013. 12. 011 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Lanitis T, Kongnakorn T, Jacobson L, De Geer A. Cost‑effectiveness of apixaban versus warfarin and aspirin in Sweden for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Thromb Res. 2014;134(2):278-287. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2014. 05. 027 Go to original source...
  18. Costa J, Fiorentino F, Caldeira D et al. Custo-efetividade dos novos anticoagulantes orais na fibrilhação auricular em Portugal. Rev Port Cardiol. 2015;34(12):723-737. doi:10.1016/j.repc.2015. 07. 004 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Amin A, Stokes M, Makenbaeva D, Wiederkehr D, Wu N, Lawrence JH. Estimated medical cost reductions associated with use of novel oral anticoagulants vs warfarin in a real‑world non‑valvular atrial fibrillation patient population. J Med Econ. 2014;17(11):771-781. doi:10.3111/13696998.2014.953682 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Ruiz MA, González‑Porras JR, Aranguren JL et al. Development and validation of a new questionnaire measuring treatment satisfaction in patients with non‑valvular atrial fibrillation: SAFUCA®. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil. 2017;26(3):767-778. doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1474-4 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Roldán V, Marín F, Fernández H et al. Predictive value of the HAS‑BLED and ATRIA bleeding scores for the risk of serious bleeding in a "real‑world" population with atrial fibrillation receiving anticoagulant therapy. Chest. 2013;143(1):179-184. doi:10.1378/chest.12-0608 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Lip GYH, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJGM. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor‑based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2010;137(2):263-272. doi:10.1378/chest.09-1584 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Proietti M, Romanazzi I, Romiti GF, Farcomeni A, Lip GYH. Real‑World Use of Apixaban for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta‑Analysis. Stroke. 2018;49(1):98-106. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018395 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Vnitřní lékařství

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.