Vnitr Lek 2015, 61(Suppl 3):25-29

Analysis of the development of metformin and sulfonylurea prescriptions in the Czech Republic

Denisa Janíčková-Žďárská1,*, Petr Honěk2, Ladislav Dušek3,4, Tomáš Pavlík3,4, Milan Kvapil1
1 Interní klinika 2. LF UK a FN Motol, Praha, přednosta prof. MUDr. Milan Kvapil, CSc., MBA
2 Všeobecná zdravotní pojišťovna České republiky, Praha, ředitel Ing. Zdeněk Kabátek
3 Ústav zdravotnických informací a statistiky, Praha, ředitel doc. RNDr. Ladislav Dušek, Ph.D.
4 Institut biostatistiky a analýz MU Brno, ředitel doc. RNDr. Ladislav Dušek, Ph.D.

Introduction:
In the Czech Republic, patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are followed and treated predominantly by specialists (approx. 80% at a specialist diabetology clinic), a minor part by general practitioners (up to 20%). Long-term development of the changes in prescribing metformin and sulfonylurea in the Czech Republic and its concordance with recommended procedures has not been evaluated until now.


Goal:
Comparison of the development of metformin (MET) and sulfonylurea (SU) prescriptions in the period of 2002-2006 with that of 2010-2014 in a representative sample of the patient population with DM kept in the database of the General Health Insurance Company of the Czech Republic (VZP) which provided health care coverage for 63% of Czech Republic population in 2014.

Methodology:
We identified all individuals in the VZP database who had a record of DM diagnosis (E10 - E16 based on ICD 10) or who had any antidiabetic therapy prescribed (ATC group A10) in the periods of 2002-2006 and 2010-2014. A cohort of patients was extracted for analysis, who had an agent from A10 group prescribed at least once in a relevant year (n = 308 962 in 2002; n = 426 695 in 2014). A number of patients was evaluated for each year, who had at least once MET or SU prescribed. The number of patients treated with MET or SU was then expressed as a percentage of all who had any therapy from A10 group prescribed in the year in question.

Results:
Metformin prescriptions have linearly risen from 43% to 77%, while sulfonylurea prescriptions have linearly decreased from 65% to 37%.

Conclusion:
The analysis presents the first evaluation of the development of metformin prescriptions conducted in the Czech Republic and evaluation of its concordance with the recommended procedures for the treatment of DM. The amount of metformin prescribed in the Czech Republic increased from 43% to 77% while the amount of SU prescribed decreased from 65% to 37% between 2002 and 2014. This development and the current ratio between the prescribed amounts of MET and SU demonstrate the implementation of the recommended procedures into practice and prove the high quality of care for patients with DM2T in specialists - diabetologists' surgeries.

Keywords: type 2 diabetes mellitus; metformin; sulfonylurea

Received: October 2, 2015; Accepted: October 18, 2015; Published: June 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Janíčková-Žďárská D, Honěk P, Dušek L, Pavlík T, Kvapil M. Analysis of the development of metformin and sulfonylurea prescriptions in the Czech Republic. Vnitr Lek. 2015;61(Supplementum 3):25-29.
Download citation

References

  1. Ústav zdravotnicvkých informací. Dostupné z WWW: <http://www.uzis.cz>.
  2. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998; 352(9131): 837-853.
  3. Česká diabetologická společnost. Doporučený postup péče o diabetes mellitus 2. typu. Dostupné z WWW: <http://www.diab.cz/dokumenty/dm2_12.pdf>. (poslední přístup 26. 9. 2015)
  4. Ústav zdravotnických informací a statistiky ČR. Diabetologie, péče o diabetiky. Dostupné z WWW: <http://www.uzis.cz/category/tematicke-rady/zdravotnicka-statistika/diabetologie-pece-diabetiky>. (26. 9. 2015)
  5. Ústav zdravotnických informaci. Mezinárodní statistická klasifikace nemocí a přidružených zdravotních problémů - MKN-10. Dostupné z WWW: <http://www.uzis.cz/cz/mkn/index.html>. (poslední přístup 26. 9. 2015)
  6. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. Structure and principles. Dostupné z WWW: <http://www.whocc.no/atc/structure_and_principles/>. (poslední přístup 26. 9. 2015)
  7. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centred approach. Update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia. 2015; 58(3): 429-442. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998; 352(9131): 854-865. Erratum in: Lancet 1998; 352(9139):1558.
  9. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA et al. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 359(15): 1577-1589. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Matthews DR, Cull CA, Stratton IM et al. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. UKPDS 26: Sulphonylurea failure in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients over six years. Diabet Med 1998; 15(4): 297-303. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Kahn SE, Haffner SM, Heise MA et al. ADOPT Study Group. Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355(23): 2427-2443. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Schernthaner G, Grimaldi A, Di Mario U et al. GUIDE study: double-blind comparison of once-daily gliclazide MR and glimepiride in type 2 diabetic patients. Eur J Clin Invest 2004; 34(8): 535-542. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. ADVANCE Collaborative Group. Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358(24): 2560-2572. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Kvapil, M. Měly by nás zajímat názory občanů na léčbu diabetu? Kazuistiky v diabetologii 2015; 13(1): 4-5.
  15. Wang TY, Eguale T, Tamblyn R. Guidelines adherence in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a historical cohort comparing the use of metformin in Quebec pre and post-Canadian Diabetes Association guidelines. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13: 442. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-442>. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Clemens KK, Shariff S, Liu K et al. Trends in Antihyperglycemic Medication Prescriptions and Hypoglycemia in Older Adults: 2002-2013. PLoS One 2015; 10(9): e0137596. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137596>. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Ekström N, Schiöler L, Svensson AM et al. Effectiveness and safety of metformin in 51 675 patients with type 2 diabetes and different levels of renal function: a cohort study from the Swedish National Diabetes Register. BMJ Open 2012; 2(4): pii: e001076. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001076>. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Leal I, Romio SA, Schuemie M et al. Prescribing pattern of glucose lowering drugs in the United Kingdom in the last decade: a focus on the effects of safety warnings about rosiglitazone. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2013; 75(3): 861-868. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Piťhová P, Honěk P, Dušek L et al. Incidence amputací u pacientů s diabetes mellitus v České republice 2010-2014. Vnitř Lék 2015; 61(11 Suppl 3): 3S21-3S24.
  20. Green JB, Bethel MA, Armstrong PW et al. TECOS Study Group. Effect of Sitagliptin on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373(3): 232-242. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. White WB, Cannon CP, Heller SR et al. EXAMINE Investigators. Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2013; 369(14): 1327-1335. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Scirica BM, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E et al. SAVOR-TIMI 53 Steering Committee and Investigators. Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2013; 369(14): 1317-1326. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. ORIGIN Trial Investigators. Gerstein HC, Bosch J, Dagenais GR et al. Basal insulin and cardiovascular and other outcomes in dysglycemia. N Engl J Med 2012; 367(4): 319-328. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM et al. EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Vnitřní lékařství

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.