Vnitr Lek 2010, 56(1):30-36

Right ventricular dysfunction after left ventricular assist device implantation

H. Říha1,4,*, I. Netuka2,4, T. Kotulák1, J. Malý2,4, M. Pinďák1, P. Kellovský1, F. Kopáč1, D. Hodr1, O. Szárszoi2,4, J. Kettner3, H. Al-Hiti2, Z. Dorazilová3, T. Marek3, I. Skalský2, J. Pirk2,4
1 Klinika anesteziologie a resuscitace, Kardiocentrum IKEM Praha, přednosta prim. MUDr. Tomáš Kotulák
2 Klinika kardiovaskulární chirurgie, Kardiocentrum IKEM Praha, přednosta prof. MUDr. Jan Pirk, DrSc.
3 Klinika kardiologie, Kardiocentrum IKEM Praha, přednosta prof. MUDr. Josef Kautzner, CSc.
4 Centrum výzkumu chorob srdce a cév IKEM Praha, vedoucí projektu prof. MUDr. Bohuslav Ošťádal, DrSc.

Objective:
The frequency of long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is increasing. Acute right ventricular dysfunction or right ventricular failure after LVAD implantation has important influence on morbidity and mortality. The aim of our study was to assess the management of right ventricular dysfunction after LVAD implantation.

Methods:
The study group comprised 21 patients with implanted HeartMate II® LVAD since December, 2006 to April, 2009. We evaluated in retrospective fashion baseline parameters of cardiovascular and other organ systems before LVAD implantation, applied pharmacological and mechanical support for the right ventricle, and important clinical outcomes to the end of June, 2009.

Results:
LVAD was implanted in 18 men and 3 women with mean age of 48.7 ± 11.2 years. The most frequent diagnosis was dilatational cardiomyopathy (9 patients; 42.9%), and the most frequent indication for implantation was bridge-to-transplantation (19 patients; 90.4%). Pharmacological support of the right ventricle after LVAD implantation comprised dobutamine (21 patients; 100%), milrinone (21 patients; 100%), isoproterenol (1 patient; 4.8%), and levosimendan (5 patients; 23.8%). In 2 (9.5%) cases there was a need for repeated application of levosimendan during postoperative course. Inhalational nitric oxide was used in 14 (66.7%) patients. Despite extensive pharmacological support, 3 (14.3%) patients needed right ventricular assist device (RVAD) implantation. Most patients (9; 42.8%) survived to heart transplantation; in one (4.8%) case LVAD was successfuly explanted; 6 (28.6%) patients is living with LVAD; 5 (23.8%) patients died during LVAD support.

Conclusion:
After LVAD implantation there is a need for aggressive pharmacological, and in some cases mechanical, support of the right ventricular function to provide adequate blood flow to LVAD in order to minimize morbidity and mortality.

Keywords: mechanical circulatory support; right ventricular dysfunction; levosimendan; nitric oxide

Received: August 13, 2009; Accepted: October 21, 2009; Published: January 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Říha H, Netuka I, Kotulák T, Malý J, Pinďák M, Kellovský P, et al.. Right ventricular dysfunction after left ventricular assist device implantation. Vnitr Lek. 2010;56(1):30-36.
Download citation

References

  1. Augoustides JG, Říha H. Recent progress in heart failure treatment and heart transplantation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009; 23: 738-748. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Netuka I, Malý J, Szarszoi O. Mechanické srdeční podpory v terapii terminálního srdečního selhání. Cor Vasa 2008; 50: 207-214. Go to original source...
  3. Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ et al. Long-term mechanical left ventricular assistance for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1435-1443. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Březina A, Říha H, Mašín J. Současné možnosti mechanické podpory cirkulace. Anest Intenziv Med 2006; 17: 38-44.
  5. Kettner J, Netuka I, Pirk J et al. První použití mechanické srdeční podpory v České republice. Interv Akut Kardiol 2004; 3: 86-88.
  6. Kettner J, Pirk J, Netuka I et al. Použití mechanické srdeční podpory - první zkušenosti v České republice. Čas Lék Čes 2005; 144: 38-42.
  7. Struber M, Sander K, Lahpor J et al. HeartMate II left ventricular assist device; early European experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34: 289-294. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Dang NC, Topkara VK, Mercando M et al. Right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 2006; 25: 1-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Netuka I, Malý J, Szarszoi O et al. Single-stage extensive chronic type A dissecting aortic aneurysm repair and continuous-flow ventricular assist device implantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009; 28: 523-526. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Haddad F, Couture P, Tousignant C et al. The right ventricle in cardiac surgery, a perioperative perspective: I. Anatomy, physiology, and assessment. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 407-421. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Greyson CR. Pathophysiology of right ventricular failure. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: S57-S65. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Haddad F, Couture P, Tousignant C et al. The right ventricle in cardiac surgery, a perioperative perspective: II. Pathophysiology, clinical importance, and management. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 422-433. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Stone ME. Current status of mechanical circulatory assistance. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 11: 185-204. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Santamore WP, Gray LA Jr. Left ventricular contributions to right ventricular systolic function during LVAD support. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61: 350-356. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Omoto T, Tanabe H, LaRia PJ et al. Right ventricular performance during left ventricular unloading conditions: the contribution of the right ventricular free wall. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 50: 16-20. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Klima UP, Lee MY, Guerrero JL et al. Determinants of maximal right ventricular function: role of septal shift. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 123: 72-80. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Saleh S, Liakopoulos OJ, Buckberg GD. The septal motor of biventricular function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29 (Suppl 1): S126-S138. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Aaronson KD, Patel H, Pagani FD. Patient selection for left ventricular assist device therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75: S29-S35. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Fitzpatrick JR 3rd, Frederick JR, Hiesinger W et al. Early planned institution of biventricular mechanical circulatory support results in improved outcomes compared with delayed conversion of a left ventricular assist device to a biventricular assist device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 137: 971-977. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Ochiai Y, McCarthy PM, Smedira NG et al. Predictors of severe right ventricular failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion: analysis of 245 patients. Circulation 2002; 106: I198-I202. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Matthews JC, Koelling TM, Pagani FD et al. The right ventricular failure risk score a pre-operative tool for assessing the risk of right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device candidates. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 2163-2172. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Weitkemper HH, El-Banayosy A, Arusoglu L et al. Mechanical circulatory support: reality and dreams experience of a single center. J Extra Corpor Technol 2004; 36: 169-173. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Chumnanvej S, Wood MJ, MacGillivray TE et al. Perioperative echocardiographic examination for ventricular assist device implantation. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 583-601. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Špinar J, Vítovec J. Intravenózní léčba akutního srdečního selhání. Vnitř Lék 2007; 53: 412-419. Go to PubMed...
  25. Nussmeier NA, Probert CB, Hirsch D et al. Anesthetic management for implantation of the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist system. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 964-971. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Missant C, Rex S, Segers P et al. Levosimendan improves right ventriculovascular coupling in a porcine model of right ventricular dysfunction. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 707-715. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Kasikcioglu HA, Uyarel H, Tartan Z et al. Do calcium sensitizers affect right ventricular functions in patients with chronic heart failure? Int J Cardiol 2007; 118: 246-248. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Kerbaul F, Gariboldi V, Giorgi R et al. Effects of levosimendan on acute pulmonary embolism-induced right ventricular failure. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 1948-1954. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Kavarana MN, Pessin-Minsley MS, Urtecho J et al. Right ventricular dysfunction and organ failure in left ventricular assist device recipients: a continuing problem. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 745-750. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Komoda T, Hetzer R, Lehmkuhl HB. Destiny of candidates for heart transplantation in the Eurotransplant heart allocation system. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34: 301-306. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Patel ND, Weiss ES, Schaffer J et al. Right heart dysfunction after left ventricular assist device implantation: a comparison of the pulsatile HeartMate I and axial-flow HeartMate II devices. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86: 832-840. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Vnitřní lékařství

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.