Vnitr Lek 2009, 55(9):808-811

How to improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy?

J. Lukl
I. interní klinika Lékařské fakulty UP a FN Olomouc, přednosta prof. MUDr. Jan Lukl, CSc.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy decreases mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure. However, around 30% of patients do not respond to this therapy. The paper analyses factors, with a possible impact on the response to this therapy. It is a left ventricular lead proximity to the left ventricle segment with the latest activity, presence and size of postinfarction scar and a percentage of fully captured paced beats. Methods of optimalization of these factors are described as well as circumstances, under which some patients should be indicated for cardiosurgical lead implantation or if a cardiac resynchronization therapy should be ommited.

Keywords: cardiac resynchronization therapy; responders; postinfartion scar; atrial fibrillation

Received: June 29, 2009; Published: September 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Lukl J. How to improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy? Vnitr Lek. 2009;55(9):808-811.
Download citation

References

  1. Turley AJ, Raja SG, Salhiyyah K et al. Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve survival and quality of life in patients with end-stage heart failure? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2008; 7: 1141-1146. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Chung ES, Leon AR, Tavazzi L et al. Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial. Circulation 2008; 117: 2608-2616. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Burkhoff D, Oikawa RY, Sagawa K. Influence of pacing site on canine left ventricular contraction. Am J Physiol 1986; 251: H428-H435. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Park RC, Little WC, O'Rourke RA. Effect of alteration of left ventricular activation sequence on the left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relation in closed-chest dogs. Circ Res 1985; 57: 706-717. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Owen CH, Esposito DJ, Davis JW et al. The effects of ventricular pacing on left ventricular geometry, function, myocardial oxygen consumption, and efficiency of contraction in conscious dogs. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998; 21: 1417-1429. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Murphy RT, Sigurdsson G, Mulamalla S et al. Tissue synchronization imaging and optimal left ventricular pacing site in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 1615-1621. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Macías A, Gavira JJ, Castaño S et al. Left ventricular pacing site in cardiac resynchronization therapy: clinical follow-up and predictors of failed lateral implant. Eur J Heart Fail 2008: 10: 421-427. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Murphy RT, Sigurdsson G, Mulamalla S et al. Tissue synchronization imaging and optimal left ventricular pacing site in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 1615-1621. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Becker M, Kramann R, Franke A et al. Impact of left ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular remodelling. A circumferential strain analysis based on 2D echocardiography. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 1211-1220. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Ypenburg C, van Bommel RJ, Delgado V et al. Optimal left ventricular lead position predicts reverse remodeling and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 1402-1409. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Becker M, Hoffmann R, Schmitz F et al. Relation of optimal lead positioning as defined by three-dimensional echocardiography to long-term benefit of cardiac resynchronization. Am J Cardiol 2007; 100: 1671-1676. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. van de Veire NR, Marsan NA, Schuijf JD et al. Noninvasive imaging of cardiac venous anatomy with 64-slice multi-slice computed tomography and noninvasive assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony by 3-dimensional tissue synchronization imaging in patients with heart failure scheduled for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol 2008; 101: 1023-1029. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Linde C, Leclercq C, Rex S et al. Long-term benefits of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure: results from the MUltisite STimulation in cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 111-118. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. White JA, Yee R, Yuan X et al. Delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intraventricular dyssynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1953-1960. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Ypenburg C, Roes SD, Bleeker GB et al. Effect of total scar burden on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 657-660. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Chalil S, Foley PW, Muyhaldeen SA et al. Late gadolinium enhancement-cardiovascular magnetic resonance as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Europace 2007; 9: 1031-1037. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Riedlbauchová L, Brunken R, Jaber WA et al. The impact of myocardial viability on the clinical outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2009; 20: 50-57. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Yokokawa M, Tada H, Toyama T et al. Magnetic resonance imaging is superior to cardiac scintigraphy to identify nonresponders to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2009; 32 (Suppl 1): S57-S62. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Mele D, Agricola E, Galderisi M et al. Echocardiographic myocardial scar burden predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischemic heart failure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22: 702-708. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Jansen AH, Bracke F, van Dantzig JM et al. The influence of myocardial scar and dyssynchrony on reverse remodeling in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur J Echocardiogr 2008; 9: 483-488. Go to original source...
  21. Bleeker GB, Kaandorp TA, Lamb HJ et al. Effect of posterolateral scar tissue on clinical and echocardiographic improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2006; 113: 969-976. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. van de Veire NR, Schuijf JD, De Sutter J et al. Non-invasive visualization of the cardiac venous system in coronary artery disease patients using 64-slice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1832-1838. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Arzola-Castaner D, Taub C et al. Left ventricular lead proximity to an akinetic segment and impact on outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006; 17: 623-627. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. van Gelder BM, Bracke FA, Meijer A et al. Effect of optimizing the VV interval on left ventricular contractility in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93: 1500-1503. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1539-1549. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2140-2150. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Young JB, Abraham WT, Smith AL et al. Combined cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioversion defibrillation in advanced chronic heart failure: the MIRACLE ICD Trial. JAMA 2003; 289: 2685-2694. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Tolosana JM, Hernandez Madrid A, Brugada J. Comparison of benefits and mortality in cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation versus patients in sinus rhythm (Results of the Spanish Atrial Fibrillation and Resynchronization [SPARE] Study). Am J Cardiol 2008; 102: 444-449. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Gasparini M, Auricchio A, Regoli FJ et al. Four-year efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy on exercise tolerance and disease progression: the importance of performing atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 734-743. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Gasparini M, Auricchio A, Metra M et al. Long-term survival in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: the importance of performing atrio-ventricular junction ablation in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 1644-1652. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Kamath GS, Cotiga D, Koneru JN et al. The utility of 12-lead Holter monitoring in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation for the identification of nonresponders after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 1050-1055. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Indik JH. Spontaneous conversion of atrial fibrillation in the setting of biventricular pacing. Cardiol Rev 2004; 12: 1-2. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Hoppe UC, Casares JM, Eiskjaer H et al. Effect of cardiac resynchronization on the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with severe heart failure. Circulation 2006; 114: 18-25. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Khan MN, Jaïs P, Cummings J et al. Pulmonary-vein isolation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1778-1785. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Vnitřní lékařství

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.