Vnitr Lek 2007, 53(3):246-252

Acute humoral rejection of renal transplant

J. Slatinská1,*, E. Honsová2, L. Lyerová1, A. Slavčev3, O. Viklický1,*
1 Klinika nefrologie, Transplantační centrum Institutu klinické a experimentální medicíny, Praha, přednosta prof. MUDr. Vladimír Teplan, DrSc.
2 Oddělení klinické a transplantační patologie Institutu klinické a experimentální medicíny, Praha, přednostka prim. MUDr. Eva Honsová
3 Imunologické pracoviště Institutu klinické a experimentální medicíny, Praha, přednosta doc. MUDr. Ilja Stříž, CSc.

Acute humoral rejection (AHR) is a rare complication which often results in the loss of kidney graft. The objective of this retrospective monocentric study was to evaluate two different approaches to AHR. Documentation of 730 patients was analysed, who underwent renal transplantation between 2002 and 2005. From 2002 to 2003, patients with AHR were treated with 5 plasmaphereses (PF group, n = 13), and from 2004 to 2005 with a combination of 5 PF and intravenous immunoglobulins (PF + IVIG, 0.5 g/kg, n = 8). Data for the period of one year post-transplant was analysed. AHR occurred in 21 out of 730 patients (2.9 %). Survival of grafts in the 6th month and in the 1st year was significantly higher for the PF + IVIG group than for the PF group only (p < 0.05). Patient survival was similar in both groups. The incidence of infectious complications was similar in both groups. There was a higher incidence of acute cellular rejections in the PF group (46.2 vs. 14.3 %) in control rebiopsies (performed due to deteriorated graft function or in order to check the efficiency of the treatment). It can be concluded that acute humoral rejection of transplanted kidney is a rare complication which can be treated by the combination of plasmaphereses and intravenous immunoglobulins.

Keywords: kidney transplant; humoral rejection; treatment; plasmaferesis

Received: November 7, 2006; Accepted: January 9, 2007; Published: March 1, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Slatinská J, Honsová E, Lyerová L, Slavčev A, Viklický O. Acute humoral rejection of renal transplant. Vnitr Lek. 2007;53(3):246-252.
Download citation

References

  1. Feucht HE, Schneeberger H, Hillebrand G et al. Capillary deposition of C4d complement fragment and early renal graft loss. Kidney Int 1993; 43: 1333-1348. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Feucht HE Complement C4d in graft capillaries - the missing link in the recognition of humoral alloreactivity. Am J Transplant 2003; 3: 646-652.
  3. Connie L, Davis MD Core curriculum in nephrology, transplant immunology and treatment of rejection. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 43: 1116-1134. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Halloran PF, Waldygmar A, Ritchie S et al. The significance of the anti-class I antipody responseI. Clinical and pathologic features of anti-class I-mediated rejection. Transplantation 1990; 49: 85-91. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Halloran PF, Schlaut J, Solez K et al. The significance of the anti-class I antibody response. II. Clinical and pathologic features of renal transplants with antibody. Transplantation 1992; 53: 550-555. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Mauiyyedi S, Colvin RB Humoral rejection in kidney transplantation: new concepts in diagnosis and treatment. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2002; 11: 609-618. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Mauiyyedi S, Crespo M, Collins AB et al. Acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation: II. Morphology, immunopathology, and pathologic classification. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 779-787. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Sun Q, Liu ZH, Ji S et al. Late and early C4d-positive acute rejection: Different clinico-histopathological subentities in renal transplantation. Kidney Int 2006; 70: 377-383. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int 1999; 55: 713-723. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Racusen LC, Halloran PF, Solez K Banff 2003 meeting report: new diagnostic insights and standards. Am J Transplant. 2004; 4: 1562-1566. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Lehrich RW, Rocha PN, Reinsmoen N et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis in acute humortal rejection: experience in renal allograft transplantation. Hum Immunol 2005; 66: 350-358. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Rocha PN, Butterfly DW, Greenberg A et al. Beneficia effect of plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin on renal allograft of patients with acute rejection. Transplantation 2003; 75: 1490-1495. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Ibernon M, Gil-Vernet S, Carrera M et al. Therapy with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin for acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 2005; 37: 3743-3745. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. White NB, Greenstein SM, Cantafio AW et al. Successful rescue therapy with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin for acute humoral renal transplant rejection. Transplantation 2004; 78: 772-774. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Jordan S, Cunningham-Rundles Ch, McEwan R Utility of Intravenous Immune Globulin in Kidney Transplantation: Effucacy, Safety, and Cost Implication. Am J Transplant 2003; 3: 653-664. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Montgomery RA, Zachary AA, Racusen LC et al. Plasmapheresis and intravenous immune globulin provides effective rescue therapy for refractory humoral rejection and allows kidneys to be successfully transplanted into cross-match-positive recipients. Transplantation 2000; 70: 887-895. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Vnitřní lékařství

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.