Vnitr Lek 2004, 50(2):118-125

[Effect of primary coronary angioplasty on long-term prognosis in patients with diabetes mellitus].

S Simek, M Aschermann, F Holm, J Humhal, A Linhart, M Psenicka, J Rohác, V Reznícek, T Kovárník, V Mrázek
II. interní klinika kardiologie a angiologie 1. lékarské fakulty UK a VFN, Praha.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate feasibility and safety of primary PCI in diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been shown to be at high risk for adverse clinical outcomes. Limited data is available on long term prognosis of diabetics treated with primary PCI.

METHODS: Retrospective analysis of consecutive 67 diabetic patients and 211 non diabetic patients treated with primary PCI from 1/1995 to 12/1999, follow up for 38 +/- 12 months.

RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. The mean age was 62 years in diabetic patients and 59 years in non diabetic patients. Hypertension (50% vs. 36%, p = 0.05), contraindications to thrombolytic treatment (13.4% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.037), cardiogenic shock (16.4% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.023), multivessel disease (34% vs. 23%, p = 0.07) and longer time delay to treatment (240 vs. 180 min., p = 0.05) were more often present in diabetic group. 47% of diabetic and 42% of nondiabetic patients received stents. The TIMI 2 or 3 flow rates were reached in 91% of diabetic patients and in 90% of nondiabetic patients, but TIMI 2 flow was found more often in diabetics (9% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.016). Higher rate of bleeding complications leading to significant change in the blood count (7.5% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.01) and higher 30 day mortality (11.9% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.05) was observed in diabetic group. However when the shock patients were excluded from the analysis, the 30 day mortality was different insignificantly in both groups (4.5% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.36). During follow up of 259 acute phase survivors 24 patients died. There was a trend to higher total long term mortality (22.3% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.07) and higher rate of nonfatal reinfarction (13.4% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.05) in diabetic group.

CONCLUSIONS: Primary PCI is safe and effective treatment of diabetic patients presenting with AMI. The higher rate of slow flow in infarct related artery after PCI observed in diabetics can be one of reasons for higher 30 day mortality in this group. Mean ischemic time in diabetics is behind the 4 hour border, where the possible benefit from reperfusion decreases. The main reason for higher mortality in our diabetic group was the higher rate of cardiogenic shock. Higher risk of bleeding complications at puncture site in diabetic patients can be explained by the lower quality of vessel wall.

Keywords: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Diabetes Complications; Feasibility Studies; Humans; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction, mortality, ; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate

Published: February 1, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Simek S, Aschermann M, Holm F, Humhal J, Linhart A, Psenicka M, et al.. [Effect of primary coronary angioplasty on long-term prognosis in patients with diabetes mellitus]. Vnitr Lek. 2004;50(2):118-125.
Download citation




Vnitřní lékařství

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.