Vnitr Lek 2024, 70(6):344-351 | DOI: 10.36290/vnl.2024.070

Autoantibodies in the diagnosis of autoimmune rheumatic diseases - practical use

Martin Žurek
III. interní klinika - nefrologická, revmatologická a endokrinologická

Autoimmune rheumatic diseases represent a diverse group of conditions that may manifest with the production of autoantibodies, immune dysfunction, and systemic symptoms. Diagnosis can be challenging due to many nonspecific manifestations. A key test used in practice is the detection of organ-nonspecific autoantibodies. Autoantibodies present in individuals with systemic rheumatic diseases can serve not only as markers for classification, diagnosis, and prognosis but also in assessing disease activity and guiding treatment decisions. Autoantibodies often also play a direct role in the pathogenesis of individual diseases.

Keywords: autoimmune rheumatic diseases, organ-nonspecific autoantibodies, antinuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor, antibodies against citrullinated peptides, antibodies against neutrophil cytoplasm.

Accepted: September 19, 2024; Published: October 3, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Žurek M. Autoantibodies in the diagnosis of autoimmune rheumatic diseases - practical use. Vnitr Lek. 2024;70(6):344-351. doi: 10.36290/vnl.2024.070.
Download citation

References

  1. Lee AY, Ang EB. A clinical overview of autoantibodies in general practice rheumatology. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(626):e599-601. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Suresh E. Laboratory tests in rheumatology: A rational approach. Cleve Clin J Med. 2019;86(3):198-210. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Andrade LEC, Damoiseaux J, Vergani D et al. Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) as a criterion for classification and diagnosis of systemic autoimmune diseases. J Transl Autoimmun. 2022 19;5:100-145. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Damoiseaux J, van Beers J. Autoantibodies to dsDNA in the diagnosis, classification and follow-up of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Transl Autoimmun. 2023; 21;6:100191. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Giacomelli R, Afeltra A, Alunno A, Bartoloni-Bocci E, et al. Guidelines for biomarkers in autoimmune rheumatic diseases - evidence based analysis. Autoimmun Rev. 2019;18(1):93-106. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Decker P, Moulinet T, Pontille F, Cravat M, De Carvalho Bittencourt M, Jaussaud R. An updated review of anti-Ro52 (TRIM21) antibodies impact in connective tissue diseases clinical management. Autoimmun Rev. 2022;21(3):103-113. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Arroyo-Ávila M, Santiago-Casas Y, McGwin G Jr, et al. Clinical associations of antiSmith antibodies in PROFILE: a multi-ethnic lupus cohort. Clin Rheumatol 2015; 34:1217. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Arbuckle MR, McClain MT, Rubertone MV et al. Development of autoantibodies before the clinical onset of systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 200316;349(16):1526-33. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Satoh M, Yamagata H, Watanabe F et al. Development of anti-Sm and anti-DNA antibodies followed by clinical manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus in an elderly woman with long-standing Sjögren's syndrome. Lupus. 1995;4(1):63-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Sirotti S, Generali E, Ceribelli A, Isailovic N, De Santis M, Selmi C. Personalized medicine in rheumatology: the paradigm of serum autoantibodies. Auto Immun Highlights. 2017 Dec;8(1):10. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Barbhaiya M, Zuily S, Naden R et al. ACR/EULAR APS Classification Criteria Collaborators. The 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023 Oct;75(10):1687-1702. doi: 10.1002/art.42624. Epub 2023 Aug 28. PMID: 37635643. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Coghlan JG, Denton CP, Grünig E et al. DETECT study group. Evidence-based detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: the DETECT study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1340-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Steen VD. Autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2005;35(1):35-42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Sobanski V, Dauchet L, Lefèvre G et al. Prevalence of anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies in systemic sclerosis: New data from a French cohort and a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(2):407-17. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Tall F, Dechomet M, Riviere S et al. The Clinical Relevance of Antifibrillarin (anti-U3-RNP) Autoantibodies in Systemic Sclerosis. Scand J Immunol. 2017;85(1):73-79. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Ceribelli A, Cavazzana I, Franceschini F et al. Anti-Th/To are common antinucleolar autoantibodies in Italian patients with scleroderma. J Rheumatol. 2010 Oct;37(10):2071-5. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.100316. Epub 2010 Aug 3. PMID: 20682663. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Fertig N, Domsic RT, Rodriguez-Reyna T et al. Anti-U11/U12 RNP antibodies in systemic sclerosis: a new serologic marker associated with pulmonary fibrosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(7):958-65. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Hamaguchi Y, Fujimoto M, Matsushita T et al. Common and distinct clinical features in adult patients with anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase antibodies: heterogeneity within the syndrome. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60442. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Liang L, Zhang YM, Chen H et al. Anti-Mi-2 antibodies characterize a distinct clinical subset of dermatomyositis with favourable prognosis. Eur J Dermatol. 2020. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Pinal-Fernandez I, Parks C, Werner JL et al. Longitudinal Course of Disease in a Large Cohort of Myositis Patients With Autoantibodies Recognizing the Signal Recognition Particle. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017;69(2):263-270. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Kurtzman DJB, Vleugels RA. Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) dermatomyositis: A concise review with an emphasis on distinctive clinical features. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(4):776-785. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Fiorentino DF, Chung LS, Christopher-Stine L et al. Most patients with cancer-associated dermatomyositis have antibodies to nuclear matrix protein NXP-2 or transcription intermediary factor 1γ. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(11):2954-62. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Yang H, Peng Q, Yin L et al. Identification of multiple cancer-associated myositis-specific autoantibodies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a large longitudinal cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 201;19(1):259.
  24. Jia E, Wei J, Geng H, Qiu X et al. Diffuse pruritic erythema as a clinical manifestation in anti-SAE antibody-associated dermatomyositis: a case report and literature review. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38(8):2189-93. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Mammen AL. Statin-Associated Autoimmune Myopathy. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(7):664-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. de Brito Rocha S, Baldo DC, Andrade LEC. Clinical and pathophysiologic relevance of autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. Adv Rheumatol. 2019;59(1):2. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Hellmich B, Sanchez-Alamo B, Schirmer JH et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024;83(1):30-47. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Bossuyt X, Cohen Tervaert JW, Arimura Y, et al. Position paper: Revised 2017 international consensus on testing of ANCAs in granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017;13(11):683-692. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Moiseev S, Cohen Tervaert JW, Arimura Yet al. 2020 international consensus on ANCA testing beyond systemic vasculitis. Autoimmun Rev. 2020;19(9):102618. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Vnitřní lékařství

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.