Vnitr Lek 2021, 67(4):212-117 | DOI: 10.36290/vnl.2021.055

Monitoring the dynamics of clinical and laboratory markers of chronic heart failure during 12 months of sacubitril/valsartan treatment

Jana Čepelová1, Marek Malý2, Josef Daněk1, Martin Malý1
1 Interní klinika 1. LF UK a ÚVN, Ústřední vojenská nemocnice, Vojenská fakultní nemocnice, Praha
2 Oddělení biostatistiky, Státní zdravotní ústav, Praha

Aim: Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) significantly improves cardiovascular morbidity, mortality, quality of life and prolongs the survival of chronic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. The aim of the study was to evaluate changes in ejection fraction, NT-proBNP and glomerular filtration after 12 months of sacubitril/valsartan treatment.

Methods: 30 patients (28 men) with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, functional classes NYHA II-III, EF LK < 40%, NT-proBNP (> 450 ng/l), with glomerular filtration > 0.5 ml/s/1.73 m2, with a potassium < 5.4 mmol/l were classified in the study. S/V treatment was started at systolic blood pressure > 100 mmHg. Ejection fraction, glomerular filtration rate and NT-proBNP values were compared before treatment and after 12 months of S/V treatment. The number of hospitalizations and deaths was also monitored.

Results: During 12 months of S/V treatment there was a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (median initial 26.3%, after treatment 36.3%, difference 7.5%, p <0.001), there was an improvement in glomerular filtration (median initial 0.90 ml/s, after treatment 0.97 ml/s, difference 0.06 ml/s, p < 0.01) and a significant reduction in NT-proBNP (median initial 1363.0 ng/l, after treatment 647.0 ng/l, difference - 600.0 ng/l, p < 0.001). The NYHA functional class has been improved by I grade in 33.3% of patients, in 63.3% the clinical condition was stationary. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure after 12 months were the same in 50.0% and in 53.3% of patients, respectively. Hospitalization for heart failure was necessary in 5 (16.6%) patients, no deaths occurred. No patient had to discontinue S/V therapy. The maximum dose of S/V 97/103 mg was achieved in 33.3% of patients, the limitation of titration was hypotension.

Conclusion: Sacubitril/Valsartan is an effective, safe, and affordable drug that significantly improves the prognosis of chronic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction, improves quality of life, reduces hospitalizations, and prolongs survival.

Keywords: heart failure, renin, angiotensin, natriuretic peptides, dual inhibition, sacubitril/valsartan, LCZ696.

Published: June 29, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Čepelová J, Malý M, Daněk J, Malý M. Monitoring the dynamics of clinical and laboratory markers of chronic heart failure during 12 months of sacubitril/valsartan treatment. Vnitr Lek. 2021;67(4):212. doi: 10.36290/vnl.2021.055.
Download citation

References

  1. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Assotiation (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2016; 18: 891-975. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibitor versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 993-1004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Packer M, McMurray JJ, Desai AS et al. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition compared with enalapril on the risk of clinical progression in surviving patients with heart failure. Circulation 2015; 131: 54-61. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Lewis EF, Claggett BL, McMurray JJV et al. Assessing health- related quality of life in patients with heart failure: a systematic, standardized comparison of available measures. Heart Fail Rew 2014; 19: 359-367. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Jaffe AS, Apple FS, Mebazaa A et al. Unraveling N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide: another piece to a very complex puzzle in heart failure patients. Clin Chem 2015; 61: 1016-1018. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Troughton RW, Frampton CM, Yandle TG et al. Treatment of heart failure guided by plasma aminoterminal brain natriuretic peptide (N-BNP) concentrations. Lancet 2000; 355: 1126-1130. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Docherty KF, Vaduganathan M, Solomon SD et al. Sacubitril/Valsartan, Neprilysin Inhibition 5 Years After PARADIGM-HF. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 10: 800-810. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Januzzi JL, Prescott MF, Butler J, et al. Association of change in n-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide following initiation of sacubitril-valsartan treatment with cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. JAMA 2019; 322: 1077-1084. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Srivastava PK, Clagget BL, Solomon SD, et al. Estimated 5-year number needed to treat to prevent cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization with angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition vs standard therapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. JAMA Cardiol 2018; 3: 1226-1231. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Velazquez EJ, Morrow DA, DeVore AD et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in acute decompensated heart failure. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 539-548. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Vnitřní lékařství

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.