Vnitr Lek 2012, 58(7-8):186-189

Detecting KRAS and its mutations in biopsy of advanced colorectal carcinoma during colonoscopy

Z. Beneš1,*, J. Abrahámová2, M. Matějčková3, Z. Antoš1, G. Puškárová1, P. Kohout1, M. Rozmahel1, A. Hep4, J. Dolina4, F. Koukolík3
1 II. interní klinika Thomayerovy nemocnice Praha, přednosta doc. MUDr. Zdeněk Beneš, CSc.
2 Onkologická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty UK a Thomayerovy nemocnice Praha, přednostka prof. MUDr. Jitka Abrahámová, DrSc.
3 Oddělení patologie a molekulární medicíny Thomayerovy nemocnice Praha, přednosta prim. MUDr. František Koukolík, DrSc.
4 Gastroenterologická klinika Lékařské fakulty MU a FN Brno, pracoviště Bohunice, přednosta prof. MUDr. Aleš Hep, CSc.

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is a very frequent malignant cancer in the Czech Republic. In recent years, significant advances have occurred in its detection and treatment. New medication has been developed that acts upon the EGRF domain expressed on the surface of cancer cells. The most important agents of this targeted treatment are cetuximab and panitumumab. Nevertheless, a known aspect of this treatment is that their efficacy is significantly reduced upon the detection of a KRAS mutation in the cancerous tissue. Usually, the evaluation of KRAS is performed on malignant tissue within the resected material. There are, nevertheless, situations where targeted treatment may or should precede a surgical procedure (the ill patient refuses an operation, a surgical procedure is unable to be performed due to co-morbidity, a cetuximab treatment is planned in CRC liver metastases): in these afflicted patients, it is necessary to perform a KRAS evaluation already during a colonoscopy with biopsy. The goal of this study was to determine and demonstrate that an evaluation of KRAS or its mutations may be performed in a biopsy. We examined 74 afflicted patients that underwent a colonoscopy with biopsy. 26 afflicted patients had demonstrated a KRAS mutation in the biopsy, which is 35 %. It may thus be stated, that a KRAS evaluation may be performed from an endoscopic biopsy, which assists in accelerating and improving the quality via targeted treatment in afflicted patients with metastatic CRC.

Keywords: colonoscopy; colorectal neoplasma; KRAS genes; mutation

Received: May 28, 2012; Published: July 1, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Beneš Z, Abrahámová J, Matějčková M, Antoš Z, Puškárová G, Kohout P, et al.. Detecting KRAS and its mutations in biopsy of advanced colorectal carcinoma during colonoscopy. Vnitr Lek. 2012;58(7-8):186-189.
Download citation

References

  1. Artale S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Veronese SM et al. Mutations of KRAS and BRAF in primary and matched metastatic sites of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 4217-4219. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Di Fiore F, Blanchard F, Charbonnier F et al. Clinical relevance of KRAS mutation detection in metastatic colorectal cancer treated by Cetuximab plus chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 2007; 96: 1166-1169. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Khambata-Ford S, Garrett CR, Meropol NJ et al. Expression of epiregulin and amphiregulin and K-ras mutation status predict disease control in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 3230-3237. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Zauber P, Sabbath-Solitare M, Marotta SP et al. Molecular changes in the Ki-ras and APC genes in primary colorectal carcinoma and synchronous metastases compared with the findings in accompanying adenomas. Mol Pathol 2003; 56: 137-140. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Oliveira C, Velho S, Moutinho C et al. KRAS and BRAF oncogenic mutations in MSS colorectal carcinoma progression. Oncogene 2007; 26: 158-163. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. van Krieken JH, Jung A, Kirchner T et al. KRAS mutation testing for predicting response to anti-EGFR therapy for colorectal carcinoma: proposal for an European quality assurance program. Virchows Arch 2008; 453: 417-431. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Tórtola S, Steinert R, Hantschick M et al. Discordance between K-ras mutations in bone marrow micrometastases and the primary tumor in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 2837-2843. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Al-Mulla F, Going JJ, Sowden ET et al. Heterogeneity of mutant versus wild-type Ki-ras in primary and metastatic colorectal carcinomas, and association of codon-12 valine with early mortality. J Pathol 1998; 185: 130-138. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Baisse B, Bouzourene H, Saraga EP et al. Intratumor genetic heterogeneity in advanced human colorectal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer 2001; 93: 346-352. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Daum O, Šíma R, Němcová J et al. Current possibilities to predict response to targeted therapy of colorectal cancer. Čes Slov Gastroent Hepatol 2009; 63: 25-28.
  11. Garcia J, Riely GJ, Nafa K et al. KRAS mutational testing in the selection of patients for EGFR-targeted therapies. Semin Diagn Pathol 2008; 25: 288-294. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Lièvre A, Bachet JB, Le Corre D et al. KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 3992-3995. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A et al. Cetuximab plus 5-FU/FA/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) versus FOLFOX-4 in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): OPUS, a randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2007; ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I., 25: No. 18S (June 20 Supplement) 2007: 4035. Go to original source...
  14. Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Hartmann JT et al. KRAS status and efficacy of first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: the OPUS experience [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26 (Suppl 15S): 4000. Go to original source...
  15. Freeman DJ. Safety and Efficacy of Panitumumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Clin Med Ther 2009; 1: 633-645. Go to original source...
  16. Bernstein WO, Lang H, Kohne C et al. Resectability and agreement between surgeons: Review of CT and MR scan of the CELIM study: Multicenter randomized trial of cetuximab/FOLFOX versus cetuximab/FOLFIRI in unresectable liver metastases. J Clin Oncol 27: 15 s, 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting (suppl; abstr. 4091). Go to original source...
  17. Loupakis F, Ruzzo A, Cremolini C et al. KRAS codon 61, 146 and BRAF mutations predict resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan in KRAS codon 12 and 13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2009; 101: 715-721. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Vnitřní lékařství

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.