Vnitr Lek 1996, 42(3):200-204

[Insulin resistance and pathogenesis of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (part II)].

E Martinka, P Galajda, M Mokán
I. interná klinika MFN, Martin.

A review of the existing views is given, focused on the role of insulin resistance (IR), impaired insulin secretion and reduced suppression of hepatic glucose output and in the pathogenesis of noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Currently, there are two basic theories on the sequence of these defects. Most of the authors suggest that NIDDM is caused primarily by insulin resistance (IR) (which is also considered an earliest detectable defect) with subsequent inability of the pancreas sufficiently compensate for IR. However, some authors suggest that NIDDM results from the abnormal pancreatic beta-cell function (disturbed pulsatility and first-phase of stimulated insulin secretion). These authors consider IR a secondary defect. It seems, that both these theories are well founded. Actually NIDDM is not a single disorder but is rather a syndrome of diverse etiology and pathogenesis. In case of NIDDM with obesity the primary etiopathogenetic role can be rather ascribed to IR. while in non-obese NIDDM subjects the secretory defect is more probable as a primary cause.

Keywords: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, metabolism, ; Glucose, metabolism, ; Humans; Insulin, metabolism, ; Insulin Resistance, physiology, ; Insulin Secretion; Liver, metabolism,

Published: March 1, 1996  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Martinka E, Galajda P, Mokán M. [Insulin resistance and pathogenesis of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (part II)]. Vnitr Lek. 1996;42(3):200-204.
Download citation




Vnitřní lékařství

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.